San Diego County Democrats for Environmental Action
  • Home
  • About
    • Bylaws
  • Join or Renew
  • Contact
  • Green Blog
  • Calendar

Green Blog

Rancho Jamul Ecological Reserve Land Swap Talking Points

12/6/2020

2 Comments

 
Picture
Rancho Jamul is critical habitat for the endangered Quino Checkerspot butterfly.
By Tommy Hough with talking points courtesy of Frank Landis

As reported in the San Diego Union-Tribune this weekend and detailed in our club's Dec. 7th Action Alert, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife acquiesced to pressure from San Diego County to exchange, or "swap," portions of the biologically valuable and previously protected Rancho Jamul Ecological Reserve for parcels within the notorious Otay Ranch Village 14 development, which our club took an official stand against last year.

In other words, at the behest of developers, the county wants to swap out portions of the Rancho Jamul Ecological Reserve for less biologically-valuable areas in order to BUILD on the reserve. And they're using a sympathetic audience at the state level to make it happen. That this is occurring in California, and in San Diego County, is unconscionable. We need your voices.
  • Rancho Jamul Estates WCB Exchange Fact Sheet  (Dec. 2020)
  • Rancho Jamul Group Opposition Letter  (Nov. 2020)
  • Endangered Habitats League Rancho Jamul Slideshow  (Nov. 2020)
  • Rancho Jamul Land Exchange Sample Letter  (Nov. 2020)

How to Participate in the Meeting

The vote will take place during tomorrow's special meeting of the California Wildlife Conservation Board at 8 a.m. We need you there, and we need you to make comments.


To speak at the meeting, fill out a speaker form NOW and submit it via e-mail to Wildlife Conservation Board staff member Mary Ahern at [email protected]. You'll want to make remarks regarding Item 3 on the agenda ("Rancho Jamul Land Exchange").

To dial into the meeting tomorrow (Tuesday) morning at 8 a.m., call (916) 535-0984, and use the phone conference I.D. of 871 789 882, followed by the pound sign.


To access the meeting via the web, click on the "Join Microsoft Teams Meeting" link on the agenda PDF and select an app or choose the "continue on this browser" option.

If you can't call in, e-mail and request that the board reject the proposal. Send your note to Wildlife Conservation Board director John Donnelly at [email protected]. Below are two sets of talking points, one from Frank Landis, and one from Renée Owens, that you can draw from for your remarks. The e-mail template you can copy and paste into a note to the board is available below.

Sample E-Mail

Send this note in immediately to Wildlife Conservation Board director John Donnelly at [email protected] so it can be distributed to board members as soon as possible.

Dear Members of the Board,

I oppose the Rancho Jamul Land Exchange (Item 3 on the Dec. 8th agenda), because it would set terrible precedents for all our public lands.

It violates state statutes and California Department of fish and Wildlife (CDFW) guidelines because it would trade endangered species habitat for land that will not support the affected species. It would also "double count" already protected lands and lands used for mitigation.

When the the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) buys land for "permanent protection," the public must be able to rely on this promise that conserved means conserved in perpetuity, not set aside for future development.

Please don't approve this exchange and violate the very safeguards meant to protect our public lands.

Thank you for taking my comment.

Sincerely,

[ YOUR NAME ]

Talking Points from Frank Landis


Remember, this is not a one-off case, and it sets a terrible precedent. If the board caves on this, there will only be more of theses cases. Trading off known endangered species habitat for a short-distance wildlife corridor that doesn't include the endangered species at risk in the first place is a terrible trade – and illegal to boot.

If the Wildlife Conservation Board and related agencies stand together with allies in the environmental community rather than breaking ranks, the case for overturning the project grows. The land swap only looks good if one assumes the developer will win the litigation.

The new, majority-Democratic San Diego County Board of Supervisors will likely have to hear at least part of this case again if the Wildlife Conservation Board doesn't approve the deal.

That the California Department of Fish and Wildlife succumbed to pressure from the County of San Diego and agreed to exchange portions of the biologically valuable, and already protected, Rancho Jamul Ecological Reserve for parcels within the Otay Ranch Village 14 area has facilitated the development, and was central to its approval by the Board of Supervisors.

The ecological reserve was initially purchased with public funds for "permanent preservation." State Law requires that ecological reserve lands can only be exchanged for lands of equal or greater value. Unfortunately, the CDFW's own analysis demonstrates that the land being offered is inferior to what is being given up.

The parcel that's been given up supports the endangered Quino Checkerspot Butterfly, among other species, and the exchange parcel lacks the soil and vegetation needed to support Quino Checkerspots. Therefore, this swap also violates CDFW guidelines in prohibiting loss of endangered species habitat.


Attempting to justify the exchange, the CDFW is double-counting as benefits lands already protected by the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP), and lands that would be used as project mitigation. And that outcome would transfer development into the middle of a wildlife corridor – that is completely unacceptable.

This exchange would set disastrous precedents for all public lands, as it means that all ecological reserves are potentially under threat and are simply placeholders if the right political pressure is applied to the CDFW.  If the land exchange is denied, better solutions can be achieved, because the incoming Board of Supervisors will have to hear at least some part of the project again.


Picture
Picture
Hikers along the Kiln Trail at Rancho Jamul Ecological Reserve.
Banner photo courtesy of the San Diego Natural History Museum
Footer photo courtesy of Earth Discovery Institue

2 Comments
Diane Nygaard link
12/7/2020 04:37:28 pm

Dear Members of the Board:

I oppose the proposed Rancho Jamul Land Exchange.(# 3 on the12/8 agenda).

This land was purchased with taxpayer funds for permanent protection. It would set a dangerous precedent for all such lands making the concept of permanent protection a travesty.

It violates two key requirements:

- it does not serve a needed conservation purpose

It supports development, not conservation.

- it is not of greater biological resource value

This is critical habitat for the endangered Quino Checkerspot. The proposed land swap will not protect this endangered species and will in effect increase their risk of extirpation in this area.

Please deny this land exchange and protect the integrity of this ecological reserve, critical habitat for the Quino Checkerspot, and the integrity of your promise to the people of California that this land would be permanently protected.

Sincerely,
Diane Nygaard
On behalf of Preserve Calavera

Reply
Renee Owens
12/7/2020 07:04:52 pm

Thanks Tommy.

Folks, call in and let them know you oppose. Strength in numbers, regardless if your comment is 5 or 500 words.


Dear Members of the Board,

Dozens of regional conservation and land protection groups - comprised of biologists, lawyers, wildfire experts, and more - have opposed this exchange for specific reasons spelled out in great detail to all parties involved.

Why, then, are so many experts being ignored? Science, expertise, and the will of the majority of stakeholders should be the primary arbiters of the decision to reject this "exchange", not developers and their cronies who want to make a deal by way of greenwashing land preservation.

Renee Owens
on behalf of the Wild Zone Conservation League

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Green Thoughts

    The blog component of San Diego County Democrats for Environmental Action welcomes content from SDCDEA members, guests and leadership.

    Archives

    October 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    December 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014

     Categories

    All
    Hiking
    Southern California
    Tommy Hough

    RSS Feed

Picture
Picture

Social Media

Quick Links

       Home
       About
       Join or Renew
       Bylaws
       Contact
       Green Blog
  • Home
  • About
    • Bylaws
  • Join or Renew
  • Contact
  • Green Blog
  • Calendar